| |
CHURCH-FUTURE Jul-12-2004
National leaders hold round table to
brainstorm on future of church
By Jerry Filteau
Catholic News Service
PHILADELPHIA (CNS) -- About 175 Catholic leaders from across the country spent two days
in Philadelphia July 9-10 brainstorming on the future of the U.S. church.
They discussed creative ways bishops and other church leaders can respond more
effectively to rapid changes in the church and the accompanying challenges in
areas such as finances, accountability and the development of future church
leadership.
The group, called the Church in America Leadership Roundtable, was composed of
bishops, business and academic leaders, professionals, philanthropists, nuns,
priests, writers, editors, and heads of various Catholic institutions,
organizations and diocesan offices. It met at Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania, the nation's oldest and largest business school.
Participants were asked at the beginning to "think out of the box, be risk
takers," said Geoffrey T. Boisi, chairman and co-founder of Mentor/National
Mentoring Partnership and one of the chief organizers of the meeting.
He said the group was challenged to be "caring and daring, but using those
institutional structures already there" and exploring ways to make them serve
the church's mission more effectively.
The meeting was closed to media but eight participants, including two of the 12
bishops involved, met with reporters following the closing Mass July 10 to
discuss what went on.
Bishop William B. Friend of Shreveport,
La., said he was struck by "the very high degree of commitment, the love of the
church and love of the Lord" evident in the gathering.
Bishop Tod D. Brown of Orange, Calif.,
who attended the round table with his diocesan finance officer, Phil Ries,
seconded Bishop Friend's remarks.
"I don't think I've ever been with a group like this before" in terms of the
concentration of talent, experience and dedication the meeting brought together,
he said.
Participants described much of the work as assessing strengths and weaknesses in
the way church structures currently operate and exploring comparable structures
in the secular world -- in corporations, nonprofit institutions, professions --
for ideas that might be translated into more effective ways for the church to
operate.
Francis J. Butler, president of FADICA -- Foundations and Donors Interested in
Catholic Activities -- cited as an example the conclusions from a breakout
session on finances that he led. He said participants in that session
recommended:
-- That every diocese comply with the church's national standards for financial
accountability.
-- That dioceses have mechanisms to assure donors they are in compliance.
-- Financial transparency and annual audits in every parish and diocese.
-- Working with and strengthening the finance councils of parishes and dioceses.
-- Establishment of a financial planning process that makes sense to those
affected by it.
-- Reviewing the effectiveness of church fund raising at every level.
There were eight such breakout sessions during the meeting, ranging from 65 to
90 minutes each.
Three addressed pastoral governance models and the role of the laity, first at
the parish, then diocesan, then national level. Three addressed management of
human resources, again at parish, diocesan and national levels. In the final two
breakout sessions, on issues of managing financial resources, the first was
devoted to parish and diocesan levels together and the second to the national
level.
Archbishop James Weisgerber of Winnipeg, Manitoba, who was general secretary of
the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops in the 1990s, was part of a diverse
panel at a luncheon session that explored how other countries and other
religions approach issues of church governance and human resources.
Among those featured in the meeting's first panel presentation, on "Challenges
and Opportunities in Governance and Accountability for Institutions in
Transition," were Archbishop William J. Levada of San Francisco; Jesuit Father
J. Donald Monan, former president of Boston College; Frederick W. Gluck, former
managing partner of McKinsey & Co., an international management consulting firm,
and retired vice president and director of the Bechtel Group; and Richard F.
Syron, chairman and CEO of the giant mortgage finance corporation Freddie Mac.
Butler said Archbishop Levada in his presentation had described the round table
as "a complement to the dialogue envisioned" by the Second Vatican Council.
Gluck told reporters that session brought "a pretty rich exchange" on things the
church might do to address the challenges it faces with a changing mix of human
resources.
Facing "increases in the number of laity delivering the services of the church,"
he said, participants discussed "different ways of integrating (laity into the
institutional structures) and making the best use of their abilities."
Jesuit Father Thomas Reese, editor of America, a New York-based national
Catholic magazine, said, "When I look at the talent gathered here, I'd hate to
count the billable hours" if participants had to be paid for attending.
"There are lots of things the church can learn from contemporary management and
use of human resources" in the corporate world, he said.
The leadership round table was a follow-up to a one-day meeting in Washington a
year ago in which about 45 Catholic corporate, educational and other leaders met
with a small group of bishops to discuss leadership challenges facing the U.S.
church.
The Wharton meeting drew four times as many participants. Boisi said
participants represented the full spectrum of views about the church as well as
the full range of secular and church leadership backgrounds across the country.
He said the follow-up to the round table could take a number of forms, from
developing leadership resources for parishes and dioceses to holding future
national meetings, either of the kind held at Wharton or in a different format.
END
Please note: the Multi-Parish Cooperative Services Group (MPCSG) model was
presented as an example of a successful case study of collaborative parish
workings in today’s Parish. Because MPCSG was invited too late to video tape
their presentation, their paper was submitted and discussed during the
Roundtable session.
Review the MPCSG Model. |